Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Global leadership have chosen competition as their highest ideal.
Trade and Resource Disparities:
World nations compete for resources, thus creating major imbalances in wealth, security, quality of living and life opportunities for the people.
Most if not all world trade among nations are money-based which guarantees a separation between have and have-not nations where some win and some lose. It is generally unknown by most global citizens that every human on earth would have been allotted approximately 3.83 pounds, 1.74 kilograms, of food per day if all food produced was evenly shared in global cooperation among all humans in 2004. What excuse is there for global famine? Read the article and government references.
Global Preoccupations With Lesser Ideals:
There is no known strategy or globally adopted policy as part of a long-term plan and reflecting global highest ideals such that all nations win. Accordingly, nations must submit to multilateral negotiations, renegotiations and marginal or short-term resolutions that conflict with national and global interests. The highest ideals of any civilization determine their global distribution model for survival resources, competency for conflict resolution, theory and application of justice, quality of social interactions, ability to harmonize within and among peoples, legacies passed to successive generations and consequently whether or not a civilization survives at all. The failure of all nations to commit to highest ideals for the human race leaves human civilization with gross susceptibilities to pursuits of lesser-evolving ideals and aspirations by other nations or entities. Such default pursuits are incompatible and perhaps damaging to the positive evolution of the entire human race.
Because nations are often preoccupied with managing defensive and offensive military positions, it becomes difficult to identify and address deficiencies of global highest ideals with which all nations win. Aggressors believe they win by striking their villain nation of focus. Defending nations believe that they win by denying aggressor nation strike capabilities. Such actions on either side reflect critical short-term thinking but do not address the motives for the initial aggression.
Weapons of Mass Destruction, WMD Proliferation, Global Insecurity:
Devastating weapons technology exists today without the corresponding restraints to guarantee their restricted use to legitimate global endeavors.
From 1940 to the present year, 2009, human civilization have spawned eight nations publicly known to possess nuclear weapons. That is eight nations in seven decades, which is an approximate increase of one nation per decade. Several additional nations have nuclear capable technology or knowledge, but they have signed treaty agreements to prevent proliferation.
Global expansion of WMD technologies are destined to continue under the current world model. Weapons of mass destruction controlled by individual nations create independent threat vulnerabilities from unstable governments and place all nations at potential risk. Currently, there are several nations controlling all known weapons of mass destruction, WMD. This world management model appears permissible until an unstable nation gains the technology and threatens another entity. Currently, rogue nations justify their right to possess WMD weapons for national defense as do all other controlling nations. WMD technology historically functioned as a peaceful deterrent to WMD use. However, rogue nations and entities may not share this most conservative commitment. As global technological progress continues, it becomes inevitable that more nations will possess the capacity for WMD development at accelerating rates. Independent national control may not represent the best management model for long-term global security.
Without long-term globally adopted controls, history is bound to repeat itself by unleashing massive destructive power against the environment and against the people. Humans must never again risk genocide or worse by permitting unstable entities to obtain and control WMD. Comprehensive and enforceable global policies should exist to manage all present and future WMD technologies of any nation or entity.
Read Global Cooperation: Conditions Proposal Obstacles Vision
Audio Podcast Feed- subscribe & listen