- Primary Obstacle to Highest Ideals:
- Ideal Manifestations:
- Conflicts between Lower and Higher Ideals:
- Costs as an Artificial Barrier:
- Current Lower Ideals:
- From Vision to Reality:
- Failed Global Leadership Efforts:
- Lost Opportunities:
- Falsely Perceived Goals:
- Humanity versus Natural Selection:
- Substandard Global Social Advancement Policies:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Current mind as a barrier to ideal mind.
Primary Obstacle to Highest Ideals:
There is really only one main obstacle. That is the competitive thinking model where the one driving thought is “what’s in it for me?” All other specific obstacles emanate from this one main obstacle.
The “what’s in it for me?” mentality exists when one refuses to value decisions and sacrifices primarily by global benefit or for the greater goodwill for all humanity. This mentality arises from a desire for gain or preservation.
Ideal Manifestations:
The greatest obstacles to human advancement are human-created and human-sustained.
Conflicts between Lower and Higher Ideals:
Who can fathom any person, organization or institution not having the future of human conditions, evolution and humanity as the highest priorities when making decisions? Could there possibly be human entities with priorities that subordinate human evolution or survival to the needs of the entity? Entities opposing positive human evolution will in some way possess the perception of losing due to pure international cooperation or benefiting from a status quo, human evolution stalemate or decline in the long-term.
Any entity who risks their influences, powers, financial compensations or benefits with the transition to a cooperative model may have sufficient motives to resist global highest ideals and thus benefit from a human evolution stalemate or decline.
Costs as an Artificial Barrier:
Cost has a way of inhibiting most programs that would advance our civilization. Human leadership often analyzes prospective programs and ideas to be highly beneficial. However, too often the cost is too high to budget or it does not meet the minimum return on investment. Excellent civilization-advancing ideas are dismissed or become noted for future possibilities because of insufficient money. Humans lacked sufficient pieces of paper etched with esoteric symbols and with faces other than their loved ones.
Current Lower Ideals:
The state of self, family, community and all humanity contribute to the current crisis environment and the crisis state of every individual human. This crisis environment prevents total healing of the mind and body. This stressed state prevents the activation of increased brain efficiency, multiple-intelligence and our next genetic evolution.
This crisis state is considered subtle at best as humans enjoy moments of happiness while awaiting the next certain moment of caution, fear and expectation of debilitating news regarding a multitude of concerns such as war, crime, poverty, loss of home and personal property, poor health management and lacking financial resources to meet obligations. These are obvious examples among many non-harmonious conditions for individual classification as crisis states and nurtured by the current civilization model.
From Vision to Reality:
Bringing the cooperative vision to reality will appear to be a very elusive accomplishment to some. This may be because the person perceiving may refuse to imagine any system other that the present one. Perhaps the person is limiting thought to the current day competition model which is incompatible with the cooperative model, where free premium education for all and mass volunteerism will drive our productivity. When mentally flexible enough to expand beyond the current environment, then an observer mentality becomes possible as if perceiving another civilization. The observer notices an extremely high level of educated and skilled people. They share every resource and work in harmony and collaboration by choice. There is no need or desire for destructive behaviors or intentions. There are multiple collaborative groups connected locally and globally to advance specific objectives. They have plenty of individual time to pursue personal interest. Their civilization has evolved to become truly civil. This preconceived civilization is our future civilization, if only we choose it and claim it as our destiny.
Failed Global Leadership Efforts:
Global leadership must agree upon the essence of the transformation and follow by rapid dissemination among all global citizens. Then global citizens will have sufficient time to contemplate the short-term and long-term rewards and obstacles of the transition.
Caution should be exercised if the reverse scenario occurs, when global citizens initially push for these advancements while current leadership remain restricted to old thinking models. To excessively delay or avoid this progress requested by citizens may invite protest and revolt.
The worst case scenario is if neither global leadership nor global citizens insist on such advancement changes before world conditions and hope decline to uncontrollable levels.
Global leadership will continue to focus on election promises and pertinent agendas. Meanwhile, with significant contributions from their advisors, they will incorporate into their speeches positive and futuristic words, phrases and ideals extracted from these proposals and other accessible communications that reflect the thoughts and dreams of their people. While coupling political accomplishments or promises with carefully incorporated phrases that approximate the thoughts and ideals of the people, leadership may gain an appearance of understanding the people. The words and ideas perhaps will be transferred from the highest ideals of the proposals outlined to complement their policy objectives. Note that those same policies will mostly likely be substandard in comparison to globally adoptable highest ideals, as their policies will be limited by their philosophies that omit at least one global citizen.
Lost Opportunities:
Humanity will again miss another accelerated growth opportunity due to “what’s in it for me” motives. Leadership will have missed another opportunity to reveal a much larger vision and role in the advancement of humanity. When global leadership fails to derive, execute and communicate every policy within the context of long-term global highest ideals, they bypass rare opportunities to reveal and to reinforce ideals that will unite nations and will sustain the human race for thousands of years.
Falsely Perceived Goals:
These ideals do not endorse a one world government leadership where human rights and compassion for all people are not valued and respected. Proposed ideals could be components incorporated into globalization (or globalisation) where laws reflecting highest ideals exist to protect and to advance the entire human race.
Humanity versus Natural Selection:
Natural selection chooses the survivorship of species both actively and by default. Earth species continue to be selected for survival and extinction genetically, socially and technologically. The human race has advanced significantly in every vital area. However, when faced with our future obstacles, the level of social progress will affect our survival far more than any other factor. Our ability to maintain peace and work together will determine our capacity to sufficiently advance technologically to confront the adversaries of the future. Global entities believe that by acting alone or without unleashing the human intelligence of every global citizen, that they can arrive in the future as advanced. At best, technologies will advance, but severely lacking the magnitude of growth rate desired and required to support global social needs.
Substandard Global Social Advancement Policies:
When leadership place technology over social and psyche development, obvious human declines occur that inhibit psychological and technological advances. There is currently mass stagnation from underdeveloped and underutilized minds. Accordingly, default lower conditions prevail such as selfishness, insecurity, increased burdens on society, declines among families and significant relationships and mistrust.
Governments choosing to control society, at the expense of healthy individual minds, are unable to find voluntary peace and progress. These are signs that the human race wants and needs a common direction to thrive together. Together is the word of focus as entities truly want to be components of a global plan that is reflected and sustained by their common ideals and beliefs. Any conditions less than these are the tools for global insecurity and competition. Continuing these conditions have caused human decline and if unchecked will place mankind on the natural selection path for extinction. Without sufficient technology, mankind will not have the tools to adequately and timely detect, identify, study, destroy or avoid external space matter coming towards earth. Without sufficient social and psyche advancement compared to technological advancement, mankind will use current devastating technology for competition, power and self annihilation. Furthermore, without sustained social and psyche conditions that nurture every global citizen, there lie the ingredients for stagnating if not debilitating technological growth required to meet known and unknown future obstacles.
Reviewing each major topic page before arriving at a conclusion is highly recommended. By analyzing only one or two topics, some readers would be prone to accelerate seeking a negative preconceived final opinion regarding the entire site content and thus preserving ones current philosophy. The concluded logical flaw could occur as one attempts to incorporate several topic page ideas and ideals into the current world model. However, changing one aspect of society affects all other aspects. Therefore, other topic proposals not yet reviewed by the reader may offer the solutions to the questions in one’s mind. Upon reviewing all major topic pages and understanding how each proposal and vision fits together to create one harmonious living model, then the reader can draw an informed conclusion. Upon contemplating all content and ideals, the reader is encouraged to conclude whether this proposed global, local and individual model for living would be superior or inferior to conditions and events we experience everyday and for our future evolution.
Current mind as a barrier to ideal mind.
Read Global Highest Ideals: Conditions Policy Obstacles Vision
Audio Podcast Feed- subscribe & listen